Why was the Sherman Antitrust Act inadequate?

I know that there was the issue of intrastate manufacturing, but what other "holes" did Sherman Act contain? Please, if you could include accessible sources, I'd greatly appreciate it.

Answer:
Let's start with a general overview: The Sherman Antitrust Act was originally intended to attack "trusts", but has been used instead to break up monopolies. (A full copy of the Act is in the second link below.)
It's major hole was that it didn't really work!
Its very first target was the Standard Oil company trust, but by the time it was implemented against that trust, Standard Oil had long since quit operating as a trust. I'd call that a "hole."
Most Acts of Congress go through a long list of definitions. This Act didn't define such obvious things as: "trust,” "combination," "conspiracy," and "monopoly." I'd consider that a "hole" in a document that was supposed to curtail trusts, combinations, consipiracies, and monopolies.
Ultimately, the Sherman Act was used against Union's--as a way of defeating them. It was never intended to do that! I'd consider that a big hole.
The Sherman Act didn't do what it sat out to do, it was ill defined, it was used against targets it wasn't intended to target, and it took way too long to become effective.

The answers post by the user, for information only, FunQA.com does not guarantee the right.



More Questions and Answers:
  • Economic statement: True or false?
  • What is the essence of learning your economy?
  • Is the rich poor divide gap widening or 'thinning' in the UK?
  • Economics Problems?
  • What Happens to the American Economy When the Saudi Government is Toppled?
  • Is there any thing in this world worth 100 billion dollars, that a single person owns, and who is it?
  • Why are cities growing so quickly in poor countries? And what are some of the likely effect of this trend?
  • True of false?
  • Is US economy doomed - at the end of its streak?
  • Should government give away surplus grain to poor countries?