What is the difference between microeconomics and macro economics?
Answer:
microeconomics is smaller than macro economics
taking micro will inform you on smaller economic issues
taking macro will do the same but with larger ones more popular
i think that the macro ap test will be harder but the micro might be more usefull personally i would take both micro the macro
Is it one has an 'a' in it and one has an 'i'? lol
Sorry, no idea.
Take microeconomics, it's much more reasonable and scientific. Macroeconomics is basically pseudoscience to give prestige to goverment intervention in the economy, which good economic theory states is negative for economic stability and development.
Macroeconomics refers to world and national economic factors, government regulations, laws, interferences, gross national products and trade balances.
Microeconomics focuses on smaller groups of persons, such as a particular industry, one corporation, or one class of workers, etc.; even if you deal with same factors, you would look at their effect on your smaller target group who are of "interest", rather than a society as a whole.
Either one is about as difficult; the micro-economics test is more detailed, the macro-economic test deals with larger laws and has more applications to worry about. Go with micro for my money. It's less abstract and more useful.
Both are equally difficult. But study both the course: you will really gain. First take micro-economics because you will feel at home with the individual family/ enterprise decisin making context and aggreagation of individual decisions. Next, take macro-economics where the variable you will study are of economy level.
The answers post by the user, for information only, FunQA.com does not guarantee the right.
More Questions and Answers: