What are the main diffrences between the World Bank and the IMF?



Answer:
WORLD BANK is a profit making financial body designed to check inequality and poverty in the world but it is doing opposite to it, making poor more poorer and marginalised .It function as per the directions from Washington.
IMF is doing the same but it needed directions from Holland, Europe.
Both are good for nothing.
institutions of capitalists.
There are lot of differences which I cant list here. Therefore request you to visit the following link-

http://www.mcps.k12.md.us/departments/is...

Hope this helps
Both the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), were founded at the Bretton Woods conference in 1944 and their functions do not differ much as both organisation have a common aim to maintain economic stability. But one will find great differences in the manner these functions are performed.

Although IMF functions are complementary to those of the World Bank Group, organizationally it is completely different.

While the World Bank provides assistance to developing countries through socio-economical projects mostly directly benefiting the intended people, the IMF serves to stabilize the international monetary system and acts as a monitor of the world?s currencies.It works to maintain an orderly system of receipts and payments between nations, all with their different currencies, exchange rates, and government policies.

This is mainly done through balance of payments support to needy countries. However, lately one may have seen a drift in IMF functions, but this has not changed much of its role as monitor of the international monetary system..
the world bank is owned by the Illuminati (Rothchilds).most banks are
i dont know about the IMF.it is likely that it belongs to the same powerstructure .which means there is no real difference.
They work together and they both are sort of controlled by the US, the WB for sure
they both are unsuccessful and make things worst
i don't really know the differences
oops
Here is the info, I'm sure you can do the comparison yourself
nothing is different. they both are toyes of hand of america
. who make slave all world . now america make all world its kingdom through to uno and its other organisation like world band and imf and etc.
its name may different but its only goal to make all world slave of america.
what ever its activities and what its charter but its last goal is only make slave all world of usa.
no body or no country can raise any objection of american anarchy. looks about irak and afganisatan all the place where may torrorirst doing worst . looks their history only america make them first powerful and then america make their country slave name of control terrorist. america can make world happy but today america is only cause of terrorist of world who hurt peace and prosperity of world.

The answers post by the user, for information only, FunQA.com does not guarantee the right.



More Questions and Answers:

More Questions and Answers:
  • what are the supportive arguments you will raise favouring capitalist economy?
  • What will the blooming economy of India promise to the poor?
  • Please help with 2000's Economics, TV Hits and News Headlines...?
  • Female president and Black president?
  • i have to write an essay on how the game monopoly relates to real life?
  • briefly outline the case for gov' intervention in the pension provision.assess effectivness of provision?
  • will the $ recover?
  • What's the difference between globalization and globalisation?
  • what are the TRADING BLOCKS?