Would the U.S.A. be better off if we simply exterminated the individuals who required welfare to survive?
That would save tons of money and considerable savings in ALL financial aspects of life. Healthcare would be less expensive due to the lack of demand. Energy would be greatly in surplus. Every imaginable cost would be less.
And just think. the lucky ones will no longer require welfare because we can pay them to do the extermination.
Answer:
When I was first married I got into an accident and lost both of my jobs. My pregnant wife was unable to work due to health issues. We lost everything due to medical expenses and no income. We were forced to get state aid.
I hated every minute of it. I refused to walk into the store using food stamps as I was too ashamed, but I had to in the end. I felt like half a human. It felt like everyone was looking at me and thinking as you do.
I healed, found new employment and we moved from the low-income housing where we'd been forced to move. I know that to someone who has been fortunate enough to not go through what I went through welfare might seem a drain on our economy and an unnecessary weight on the tax base. I am here to tell you that those who use welfare are people. Granted, some find it easier than being productive members of society, but for every person like that there are scores who just plain need the help.
Since that time I have had another child, received a Bachelor's degree, a Master's degree and an MBA. I have also purchased my first house.
Think of that when you peddle your message of hate and moral superiority.
But then you wouldn't have anybody to feel better than, unless you start exterminating people who have red hair or big hands or something like that.
No that's a waste of precious lead/poisonous gas. I think we should instead offer them employment by forcing them to do menial work in exchange for their lives.
DO YOU WANT TO KILL PEOPLE ON DISABILITY TOO? DO YOU WANT TO KILL EVERY MINORITY GROUP
then we would have to deal with human right groups and our allies wouldn't be too happy about that.
riots would arise because Americans would not stand for mass murder of their own people. chaos.. pure chaos
Are you the reincarnation of Adolf Hitler..?
Of course we'd be better off financially; however, Jesus told us we'd always have poor people around.
i dont think getting rid of people who need help is the answer. after all it isn't their fault, like me i work, take care of my home, my husband works, but at the end of the day because of the current economy, we need a bit of help to feed our 2 children. i do believe the eliminating those who abuse such a good program should be eliminated. there are people who won't work, keep having kids so they can get more money (meanwhile neglecting the children) and even have multiple social security numbers to recieve more benefits then they need.
No.
They should be required to work in community service.
Have you ever known someone who lost their job or suddenly had a disability which prevented them from working?
If you mean only those getting corporate welfare, yes. Would save billions. Social welfare costs little in comparison.
You'd be better off if you didn't waste vast amounts of money starting wars you can't win.
All this is true, but. awww, this is too difficult to answer, cause you are right, but the way to solve it you are proposing is not correct. what if we give them all a job?
When you subsidize something it grows.
The government is subsidizing irresponsibility.
No. Many people on welfare get off it and become productive and useful citizens, and all should have the opportunity to do so.
No we wouldn't be better off.
Pfff.
Thanks for the 2 points!
We could also save even more money it we turned them into food. We could call it soylent red white and blue
I think that the people on well fare should just get jobs and make money like the rest of us, what makes them so special.
More Questions and Answers:
More Questions and Answers:
Why Norway's per capita GDP is so rich?
I need resources to find work in the field of non-governmental organizations.?
canadian mexican & american dollar is there a new curracy coming?
what is a consumption subsidy?
How has NAFTA affected the U.S. econmy?
in consumer behavior, what does "consumption stereotype" mean? and self concept/product image congruency?
Why does Canada, Australia, and the US all want to have population growth at 1% per year?
How many English pounds are in a dollar?
Can planning be done for becoming top valued currency - country of the world ;if so in how much period next?
And just think. the lucky ones will no longer require welfare because we can pay them to do the extermination.
Answer:
When I was first married I got into an accident and lost both of my jobs. My pregnant wife was unable to work due to health issues. We lost everything due to medical expenses and no income. We were forced to get state aid.
I hated every minute of it. I refused to walk into the store using food stamps as I was too ashamed, but I had to in the end. I felt like half a human. It felt like everyone was looking at me and thinking as you do.
I healed, found new employment and we moved from the low-income housing where we'd been forced to move. I know that to someone who has been fortunate enough to not go through what I went through welfare might seem a drain on our economy and an unnecessary weight on the tax base. I am here to tell you that those who use welfare are people. Granted, some find it easier than being productive members of society, but for every person like that there are scores who just plain need the help.
Since that time I have had another child, received a Bachelor's degree, a Master's degree and an MBA. I have also purchased my first house.
Think of that when you peddle your message of hate and moral superiority.
But then you wouldn't have anybody to feel better than, unless you start exterminating people who have red hair or big hands or something like that.
No that's a waste of precious lead/poisonous gas. I think we should instead offer them employment by forcing them to do menial work in exchange for their lives.
DO YOU WANT TO KILL PEOPLE ON DISABILITY TOO? DO YOU WANT TO KILL EVERY MINORITY GROUP
then we would have to deal with human right groups and our allies wouldn't be too happy about that.
riots would arise because Americans would not stand for mass murder of their own people. chaos.. pure chaos
Are you the reincarnation of Adolf Hitler..?
Of course we'd be better off financially; however, Jesus told us we'd always have poor people around.
i dont think getting rid of people who need help is the answer. after all it isn't their fault, like me i work, take care of my home, my husband works, but at the end of the day because of the current economy, we need a bit of help to feed our 2 children. i do believe the eliminating those who abuse such a good program should be eliminated. there are people who won't work, keep having kids so they can get more money (meanwhile neglecting the children) and even have multiple social security numbers to recieve more benefits then they need.
No.
They should be required to work in community service.
Have you ever known someone who lost their job or suddenly had a disability which prevented them from working?
If you mean only those getting corporate welfare, yes. Would save billions. Social welfare costs little in comparison.
You'd be better off if you didn't waste vast amounts of money starting wars you can't win.
All this is true, but. awww, this is too difficult to answer, cause you are right, but the way to solve it you are proposing is not correct. what if we give them all a job?
When you subsidize something it grows.
The government is subsidizing irresponsibility.
No. Many people on welfare get off it and become productive and useful citizens, and all should have the opportunity to do so.
No we wouldn't be better off.
Pfff.
Thanks for the 2 points!
We could also save even more money it we turned them into food. We could call it soylent red white and blue
I think that the people on well fare should just get jobs and make money like the rest of us, what makes them so special.
The answers post by the user, for information only, FunQA.com does not guarantee the right.
More Questions and Answers:
More Questions and Answers: