What are you comments on this trade dispute?
This request, dated 10 July 1997, is in respect of the imposition of anti-dumping duties by the US on imports of colour television receivers (CTVs) from Korea. Korea contends that the US has for the past twelve years maintained an anti-dumping order for Samsung’s CTVs despite the absence of dumping and the cessation of exports from Korea, without examining the necessity of continuing to impose such duties.
Answer:
In my opinion charges of dumping are ALWAYS bogus, and the government only plays along as a way to rationalize mere protectionism. In this case, I'd be confident that Korea is correct in its complaint that the US government is unfairly charging and penalizing Samsung for dumping.
More Questions and Answers:
Where is the highest standard of living in Latin America?
why do we study economics?
what is the impact of language in our lives?
Unemploment is a big problem in India. Please explain how could we save our educated young mass from the same?
what is normative accounting?
What steps has the government taken to correct the problems of market failure of healthcare and s.s.? Why?
why it's not possible that OPEC's total revenue would increase if it were yo cut its production?
Why is the demand curve.?
Intermediate Macro-?
Answer:
In my opinion charges of dumping are ALWAYS bogus, and the government only plays along as a way to rationalize mere protectionism. In this case, I'd be confident that Korea is correct in its complaint that the US government is unfairly charging and penalizing Samsung for dumping.
More Questions and Answers: