If multiculturalism is good, how is globalization bad?
If it's wonderful to have people from different cultures come here, which I agree it is, then isn't it also wonderful to import things from other countries? Do you realize what things would cost, what consumer inflation would be, if we'd still had protectionism in place for the last 15 years and the Fed had expanded the money supply at the rate it's been expanding?
And if in a society that provides you with 12 years of free public education through Calculus, Physics, Chemistry, Trig, and inexpensive community college and reasonably priced in-state college, you're now an adult and some barefoot peasant living in a thatch-roof hut with no electricity or running water is capable of taking your job away from you, why would you admit this much less blame macroeconomic policy?
Answer:
As far as the "stealing Jobs" part,
firstly, you can't steal someone's job unless you are a slave in some way (the 1860 republican party was against slavery for this reason) or you are writing laws that say something to the effect of, "All members of the Kikuyu tribe are not allowed to work as computer programmers"
Unless there is violence involved, it's just a matter of either being willing to do work for less $ or doing better work.
The jobs taken by people in huts are largely unskilled labour, which non-immigrant Americans are usually unwilling to do.
The jobs that are taken from the people who took calculus are being taken by either the Irish or Indians. the Irish who are undergoing an economic boom right now as a result of investment in education. India is the country that created the base 10 system that made algebra possible. they also have good education, though they have worse wealth inequality.
In Either case, this is a result of better quality.
If you don;t want your job taken , get a good education AND Pwn hard enough at your job that you become indispensible. keep learning stuff too.
I can't figure out what your point is. Still, I think you're getting things wrong.
Globalization is not the same as open market. The USA has a very strong protectionist policy in agricultural products, yet it favors free trade. The USA favors world interdependence, yet refuses to sign international agreements (the Kyoto protocol being just one of many).
Globalization does not favor multiculturalism. Every day it gets easier to move goods from one place to another, but no such thing is happening with people. There are very few examples of international agreements to allow the "export" of labor.
Multiculturalism is not built on goods. Having a Thai food restaurant in your downtown area does not make your city multicultural, even if the owner seems Asian.
Multiculturalism is not tourism. There might be people from other countries in your city but multiculturalism aims at a permanent situation, where you would have to deal with them at school and at work, and accept it.
At the end, if you are against protectionism of goods, you must also be against policies that prohibit the entrance of people from other countries to yours since "open" means open. Are you ready for that?
Multiculturalism is NOT good. A nation needs to be unified. That's why it is important for immigrants to assimilate. People immigrating to a new country need to learn the language, or they will be stuck in dead-end jobs. They will be unable to participate in social and political enterprises.
We need to concentrate on what we all have in common, not on what divides us. In unity there is strength.
Globalization is trying to force all countries into the same mold. It is the opposite of "multiculturalism" applied internationally. Where politicians are promoting the differences between people within a country, they are trying to eliminate the differences between sovereign countries.
The reason for this, is that they are trying to create a one-world government. They don't want us to identify with other American. They encourage immigrants not to assimilate, so that we are not a unified people. At the same time, they try to force all nations to accept the same standards. For example: look at the European Union. The member countries are being told that they have to change their laws so that they conform to the European Union's Charter.
The ultimate goal is a one-world government, the New World Order. The people pushing this idea expect to rule this New World Order.
More Questions and Answers:
More Questions and Answers:
Can the cost of living go down?
What are three Alternative Methods for Maximizing Food Productions in Haiti?
an economic question?
What makes you tick? Money, helping others, independence?
can india be at par with the other developed nations in this century?
What was the totalitarian regimes of Germany, Italy, and the Soviet Union...?
if we did not buy foreign oil for one month what kind of impact would it have?
How does Arrow's Impossibility Theorem relate to the Second Theory of Welfare Economics?
discussing?
And if in a society that provides you with 12 years of free public education through Calculus, Physics, Chemistry, Trig, and inexpensive community college and reasonably priced in-state college, you're now an adult and some barefoot peasant living in a thatch-roof hut with no electricity or running water is capable of taking your job away from you, why would you admit this much less blame macroeconomic policy?
Answer:
As far as the "stealing Jobs" part,
firstly, you can't steal someone's job unless you are a slave in some way (the 1860 republican party was against slavery for this reason) or you are writing laws that say something to the effect of, "All members of the Kikuyu tribe are not allowed to work as computer programmers"
Unless there is violence involved, it's just a matter of either being willing to do work for less $ or doing better work.
The jobs taken by people in huts are largely unskilled labour, which non-immigrant Americans are usually unwilling to do.
The jobs that are taken from the people who took calculus are being taken by either the Irish or Indians. the Irish who are undergoing an economic boom right now as a result of investment in education. India is the country that created the base 10 system that made algebra possible. they also have good education, though they have worse wealth inequality.
In Either case, this is a result of better quality.
If you don;t want your job taken , get a good education AND Pwn hard enough at your job that you become indispensible. keep learning stuff too.
I can't figure out what your point is. Still, I think you're getting things wrong.
Globalization is not the same as open market. The USA has a very strong protectionist policy in agricultural products, yet it favors free trade. The USA favors world interdependence, yet refuses to sign international agreements (the Kyoto protocol being just one of many).
Globalization does not favor multiculturalism. Every day it gets easier to move goods from one place to another, but no such thing is happening with people. There are very few examples of international agreements to allow the "export" of labor.
Multiculturalism is not built on goods. Having a Thai food restaurant in your downtown area does not make your city multicultural, even if the owner seems Asian.
Multiculturalism is not tourism. There might be people from other countries in your city but multiculturalism aims at a permanent situation, where you would have to deal with them at school and at work, and accept it.
At the end, if you are against protectionism of goods, you must also be against policies that prohibit the entrance of people from other countries to yours since "open" means open. Are you ready for that?
Multiculturalism is NOT good. A nation needs to be unified. That's why it is important for immigrants to assimilate. People immigrating to a new country need to learn the language, or they will be stuck in dead-end jobs. They will be unable to participate in social and political enterprises.
We need to concentrate on what we all have in common, not on what divides us. In unity there is strength.
Globalization is trying to force all countries into the same mold. It is the opposite of "multiculturalism" applied internationally. Where politicians are promoting the differences between people within a country, they are trying to eliminate the differences between sovereign countries.
The reason for this, is that they are trying to create a one-world government. They don't want us to identify with other American. They encourage immigrants not to assimilate, so that we are not a unified people. At the same time, they try to force all nations to accept the same standards. For example: look at the European Union. The member countries are being told that they have to change their laws so that they conform to the European Union's Charter.
The ultimate goal is a one-world government, the New World Order. The people pushing this idea expect to rule this New World Order.
The answers post by the user, for information only, FunQA.com does not guarantee the right.
More Questions and Answers:
More Questions and Answers: