Which ones is better CAPITALISM OR COMMUNISM?
and why?
Answer:
In theory, both are good. Communist systems, though, tend to exist by oppression of citizen freedoms, personal choice, etc, and the corruption tends to bloom early on. What one person or committee could PLAN an entire economic system that would be satisfactory for everyone? In a capitalist state, a variety of independent forces actually shapes the economy. The gov't of a communist state almost makes you a criminal for wanting to leave. Those same citizens often risk their lives to come HERE, where they prosper. They're always free to leave, but few do, and that should tell you something.
more money in capitalism
Capitalism, It allows choices. With Communism, you get what there is. Such as in North Korea, there's no food you go hungry.
Communism is loaded with favoritism also, you get based on your allegiance to the Party.
This is a hard question you see I being Muslimah have views which you would nor could never understand but i shall day this both can be of benifit of all if peace and the commons man best intrest is at heart. You see it is all for one one for all!
Under any system we can live peacefully so it depends on whom good & bad!
Just reading about Stalinist Communist Russia should scare any aspiring reds under the bed. He probably had more people killed than anyone else in history, including Hitler.
They both have severe flaws: communism (or rather, a command economy) suffers from shortages and surpluses, while capitalism (or rather, a market economy) suffers from poverty and callousness. In practice, pure capitalistic countries have suffered from unrest and rebellion (such as the United States in the 1890s) while pure communist societies have simply failed to outperform capitalist rivals and more or less disappeared. This suggests that capitalism is better - but neither is what I'd call fantastic.
Luckily, there are pretty much no countries in the world that practice either pure capitalism or pure communism - even the United States has some command economy features (such as social security), and even Cuba or China have some market economy features (such as private ownership).
Personally, I'd go with about 3 parts capitalism to 1 part communism. Shake well, then serve.
Capitalism and Communism are two different stages arrives as a result of the developments of human society. Society always change so these ideals also change. We cant say which is better.
E-mail id for more information: vijayaprakashpadanilathu@yahoo...
More Questions and Answers:
More Questions and Answers:
Where can I find fiscal and monetary policies of other countries?
Are there 50 cent coins in the U.S.?
Are the benefits/upside of globalization gradually replacing our instincts and habits of war/violence?
what is the rule of 7 regarding economics?
what is israels biggest asset? iol? natural gas? US? or what?
Why are Indian men (in particular Hindu) poor tippers? Are they thinking in terms of Rupees or what?
economic and geographic reasons the chinese went to help build the canadian pacific railway in the 1870s & 80s
Is inflation necessarily harmful?
My last question before the test ^_^?
Answer:
In theory, both are good. Communist systems, though, tend to exist by oppression of citizen freedoms, personal choice, etc, and the corruption tends to bloom early on. What one person or committee could PLAN an entire economic system that would be satisfactory for everyone? In a capitalist state, a variety of independent forces actually shapes the economy. The gov't of a communist state almost makes you a criminal for wanting to leave. Those same citizens often risk their lives to come HERE, where they prosper. They're always free to leave, but few do, and that should tell you something.
more money in capitalism
Capitalism, It allows choices. With Communism, you get what there is. Such as in North Korea, there's no food you go hungry.
Communism is loaded with favoritism also, you get based on your allegiance to the Party.
This is a hard question you see I being Muslimah have views which you would nor could never understand but i shall day this both can be of benifit of all if peace and the commons man best intrest is at heart. You see it is all for one one for all!
Under any system we can live peacefully so it depends on whom good & bad!
Just reading about Stalinist Communist Russia should scare any aspiring reds under the bed. He probably had more people killed than anyone else in history, including Hitler.
They both have severe flaws: communism (or rather, a command economy) suffers from shortages and surpluses, while capitalism (or rather, a market economy) suffers from poverty and callousness. In practice, pure capitalistic countries have suffered from unrest and rebellion (such as the United States in the 1890s) while pure communist societies have simply failed to outperform capitalist rivals and more or less disappeared. This suggests that capitalism is better - but neither is what I'd call fantastic.
Luckily, there are pretty much no countries in the world that practice either pure capitalism or pure communism - even the United States has some command economy features (such as social security), and even Cuba or China have some market economy features (such as private ownership).
Personally, I'd go with about 3 parts capitalism to 1 part communism. Shake well, then serve.
Capitalism and Communism are two different stages arrives as a result of the developments of human society. Society always change so these ideals also change. We cant say which is better.
E-mail id for more information: vijayaprakashpadanilathu@yahoo...
The answers post by the user, for information only, FunQA.com does not guarantee the right.
More Questions and Answers:
More Questions and Answers: