The decision to "Pull" WTC 7 was made just before its collaps according to owner Silverstien. How?

To implode a building such as WTC 7 would have taken months to set up. Now they deny that it was imploded they say the steel was weakened by fire. Watch this and decide for your self.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6qv6lk8j...

Answer:
I watched the clip, and I thought it was a good clip! Maybe you should pass a few thousand pairs of those magic sunglasses around! Then you might get some more enlightened answers to your excellent question!

I think I'll pass, thank you. I did look at one website about this once and it was largely unintelligible babble.

While the external damage to building 7 was minimal, there was a fire that did burn for a long time. While under normal conditions it probably could have been easily controlled, remember that two towers had already fallen and many firefighters had died, since 7 had been evacuated, it seems no attempt was made to save it,. It seems that "pull" may have meant pull out the firefighters, but from what I read it seems no one even went in to start with (which may or may not have been known by Silverstein at the time, since in normal condtions the fire department does try to put out fires).

The answers post by the user, for information only, FunQA.com does not guarantee the right.

FunQA.com

The decision to "Pull" WTC 7 was made just before its collaps according to owner Silverstien. How?

Topic