Should we be aloud to search for oil in the artic national wildlife refuge?
Answer:
no we shouldn't. we should protect the national wildlife and all precious wildlife.
no we shouldnt. i think we should have a tighter bond with the middle east where the majority of the oil is so we dont have to find more. or pay these rediculous amounts for gas
No...we should focus our time and resources on finding better energy sources...
NOPE we shouldnt.
If I were king you would all be on bicycles, and trains, but I'm not the king.
If King Bush were to ask me, I'd tell him to hit the artic national wildlife refuge before hitting the middle eastern, and venezuelan people.
we shouldnt bother with bandaids when we are cutting our own throats. We cant drill our way to oil independance, short term or long term, and we shouldnt be trying. Im not saying that there may or may not be a large amount of oil under there that we may or may not be able to get out and into use without a catastrophe, but that the best new source of energy is efficiency. Read a book called the end of oil, and another called save energy create jobs.
I definitely don't think so. We're getting by without it and would only be doing it to make it cheaper. But more importantly, we've already proven that we can drastically cut down on dependency on fossil fuels, but the only reason we don't switch more to them as a society is that Big Oil has a grip on the collar of US government. Lobbyists make life grand.
No.
Wouldn't drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge defeat the purpose of having a national wildlife refuge?
No, not at all. Instead of spending money, time and effort into the amount of oil that won't last for more than 20 years, we should be looking for alternative fuels that are more sustainable. And the risks, like an oil spill would damage the biodiversity and fragile tundra ecosystem of the ANWR. it's just not...smart, personally.
No we should not be ALLOWED to search for oil in a wildlife refuge. But if we did search I am sure it would be LOUD.
It defeats the whole purpose of having a wildlife refuge and having all of these agencies that protect it..like the one that I work for. If they searched for oil, found it, and started drilling..the amount of debris off of rigs and ships alone would harm the wildlife besides the potential oil spills that could occur. No particular technique would be able to help in the event of an oil spill in a "sensitive area."
No. Estimates vary on how much oil is actually expected to be in the arctic refuge, but even if it's a decent amount, that oil will run out and we will be back in the situation we're in today, only worse. Instead of simply postponing the day when we run out of oil, we should invest the money that would be spent drilling in the arctic refuge into researching and commercializing alternative renewable fuels.
The answers post by the user, for information only, FunQA.com does not guarantee the right.
More Questions and Answers: