Do plants eat each other in the event of a nuclear holocaust?

just wondering..

Answer:
there wont be any plants alive after a nuclear holocaust
the next one will make Hiroshima look like micky mouse
Probably not, tho those better equipped to survive the changed conditions will expand their ranges.

And it is not impossible for mutated plants to develop to fill the niches vacated by the demise of the animal kingdom, over a long period of time.
Why would they?

I recently read about a type of mushroom that thrives in highly radioactive areas, such as the fallout from the Chernobyl meltdown. Scientists are thinking of using it to help in the breakdown of our stockpiles of nuclear waste.
I like to answer a question with a question so:

WOULD U EAT UR PARENTS IN NUCLEAR STUFF ?WOULD U?
Most plant life will die, it would be very similiar to the asteroid impact that killed off the dinosaurs, only it would be highly radioactive too. Earth would recover after another couple hundred million years and life would take a totally different course. Perhaps extreme bacteria that live at the bottom of the ocean would be the only survivors and evolution would start again from this common ancestor.
Of course not, but if they are next to each other and you only water ONE more often than the other, then the other would just take the plant's water.

The answers post by the user, for information only, FunQA.com does not guarantee the right.



More Questions and Answers:
  • Isn't this "EARTH" concert to save the earth using an incredible amount of energy?
  • Where do I find resources to calculate my "carbon footprint"?
  • Who do i call to start a mandatory recycle program in glendora?
  • Do people understand the difference between global warming and human induced global warming?
  • I need help with Water and Air Pollution?
  • Permaculture: Can we buy ourselves green?
  • Live Earth is a load of ****?
  • Which are the best renewable energy companies in the US?
  • Why the people are not aware about water scaricity?Is the govt. only responsible for water conservation?