For all true believers, does this interview show the IPCC to be a politically motivated organization?

http://www.larouchepub.com/eiw/...

Go to the interview with Nils-Axel, a guy that studies sea levels, and read it in full. Read about how a group from the IPCC pulled down a famous tree because it didn't help support their case for rising waters. Read about the incorrect data they pluck out of the air to put in the all knowing "models". Read about the fear tatics this group uses to get funding and attention. This should shed light on the organization that is brainwashing so many folks around the world. I'm sure I'll get some mean answers as you always do when you point to real scientist siting observational data that doesn't support the doom and gloom preached by most.
Read about what this man thinks of the sea rising and how much he thinks it will rise in the next 100 years. If you have an open mind and really care about the planet you will read this interview in full.

Answer:
www.larouchepub.com/eiw/public... -

Try that one Mike.
And yes,like the ice age cometh in the 70s,this gw movement is finally dying.
Thank you, John:

I still cannot find the interview on that link.
C'mon ... "Executive Intelligence Review" ... that's as big a joke as "FoxNews". You gotta come up with better sources of shlock journalism than those. Every "article" is some kind of conspiracy theory.
This same question was asked not long ago...

Media and propaganda can lead to public scares and false allegations (like asteroid impacts and gas shortages). However, my area has released yet another "air quality advisory” due to ozone and particulate matter. So my stance is this: yes the extent of the human impact on global warming is debatable and it may not have the huge impact some are predicting (then again maybe it will, I am not yet convinced), because there is an infinite number of variables to consider when modeling the Earth. However, lessening emissions, offering government subsidies, and decreasing reliance on a finite source of fuel will only promote better living conditions. I don’t want to suggest those who do not believe humans are impacting global temperatures are “'conspiracy theorists” but I do often doubt their motives. Looking for the easy way out that justifies a high consumer lifestyle is much easier then being part of a group that wants nothing more than to create a habitable environment for future generations.
Not only is it politically motivated, it is malevolent.

I'm telling you...trials...crimes against humanity. The US can absorb their share of the trillions of dollars in taxes they want to levy, but there will be debilitating inflation. Remember those old newsreels of Germans using wheelbarrows full of cash to buy a loaf of bread. Developing countries and those with less robust economies will be strangled - facing an inevitably slow death. The only outlet will be banding together in a truly global WWIII.

The answers post by the user, for information only, FunQA.com does not guarantee the right.



More Questions and Answers:
  • Is "Global Warming" forum a failure in FunQA.coms?
  • Why is the US intent upon putting Lake Winnipeg at risk?
  • What is the point of having E-85 fuel compatibility ?
  • Give your opinion how endangered species can be saved?
  • Which one is better for the environment: burning wood or burning fossil fuels?
  • Global warming -.- ?
  • If everyone is so concerned about global warming, why is cremation so popular?
  • Does anyone know if there is a law in Michigan about replanting trees if you are a logging company?
  • How do i find the volunteer contact for the global warming photo?