Global Warming scare tactic sheople,, do you understand the difference?
Man "contributes" to greenhouse gasses, they did not "cause" them.
Those contributions stem from everything from farting to launching the space shuttle. And there are absolutely no figures that specify what actions contribute any specific amount.
Answer:
"contributing to" a disaster is THE SAME as making things worse. you seem to admit that, so why are you making fun of people who are trying to make things better
UNFAIR
You're using FACTS!
Thats not allowed!
The political correctness police will be visiting you soon.
Just keep your head buried in the sand.
We are 'contributing' to the greenhouse gases, and obviously damaging our world. We're 'causing' the world a great deal of problems by 'contibuting' these greenhouse gases. There are many studies proving that driving vehicles, and running PVC factories are generously 'contributing' to the greenhouse gases. We are ruining our world. The greenhouse gases ruin the Ozone layer, which in turn, melts the polar ice caps, and heats up the ocean. When the ocean heats up, it causes off-weather, and it gets worse with every degree it heats up. Also, the sea levels are rising due to the melting of the polar ice caps. I hope you re-consider what you just said. You're question doesn't make any sense, by the way.
I not sure about the farting, but everything else you said is true. We did not cause global warming, but we are hurrying it along.
We did not light the forest fires, although some maybe. We do not erupt volcanoes. We do not cause dust storms in the deserts. All of these things contribute to global warming as well, and mankind has nothing to do with it, nor any control over them. So no we didn't cause global warming, but yes we do contribute to it.
Gross scientific distortion.
Bureaucratic coercion.
Are you ready to realize just how ugly the inner workings of the GW propaganda machine actually are?
"The "international community", with its adoption of the UN-climate convention at Rio de Janeiro in 1992, has recognized the existence of an additional "greenhouse effect" caused by man (i.e. anthropogenic) and having a "self-evident nature". Since that time, "recalcitrant" individuals who disregard the welfare of mankind as a whole may be labeled quite officially as "liars". The discussion of the energy policy of the future- bears the imprint of Max Horkheimer's "critical theory" and its postulate of the "social duty of science". Thus, this branch of science has also been gobbled up by both politicians and ideologists. We are waiting for legal action to be brought to bear against "recalcitrant revisionists" in the area of climatology. Obviously, a new law would need to be added to the Penal Code covering such things as "negation or verbal minimization of the greenhouse effect."
http://www.vho.org/tr/2003/2/nettesheim1...
"One former member and current outspoken critic of the panel testified to its bias before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee in May of 2001. As I wrote following the release of the Working Group I Summary in February of this year, Dr. Richard Lindzen swore that, based on his experiences as a member, the IPCC was actually created specifically to support negotiations concerning CO2 emission reductions and would accept no contrary findings from its members:
"...throughout the drafting sessions, IPCC ‘coordinators' would go around insisting that criticism of models be toned down, and that ‘motherhood' statements be inserted to the effect that models might still be correct despite the cited faults. Refusals were occasionally met with ad hominem attacks. I personally witnessed coauthors forced to assert their ‘green' credentials in defense of their statements."
Perhaps it's the IPCC's assessment that they and only they already know the truth and can little afford allowing expert advice or facts to interfere with it."
http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/06/m...
You know as well as I do that those on the Global Warming Scarewagon make no effort to try to understand anything.
So contributing does not count
what is your point
suppose we contribute 80%
and you are wrong there is a lot of Data on desertification
which is a definate climatic and Environmental change
150.000 people dying anually ,and 3500 in Europe alone in 2003,related to Global warming tells us something
3000 species of Animals became exstinct in the last 50 years
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...
Farmers suffer croploss due to temperature changes (1 degree means already 10% croploss)
the perma frost on the tundras is melting
so are the Glaziers ,the North Pole , Greenland and great chunks of Antarctica have dropped into the sea
We are facing cronic water shortage ,and in India,China ,Africa and Mexico people are forced to drink contaminated water or die of thirst
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...
The Sahara is grows 7 kilometers a year
Northern China is drying up and 2 mayor desserts are becoming one giant dessert
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...
The answers post by the user, for information only, FunQA.com does not guarantee the right.
More Questions and Answers: