Are republicans SMARTER than Scientist in global warming?

nope
not one of them
that why they lost 2006 and katrina

Answer:
nope, but MIT professor Dr. Lindzen and Colorado State prof. Dr Gray might be... since they both happen to be atmospheric scientists. Ouch, it must burn to have your question destroyed before it even got started. Then again, your apparent lack of spelling ability and grammatical skills didn't give your question much hope of earning many stars.
Republicans have never said that they were smarter than scientists. However, there are many scientists who do not agree with the media's view on global warming. The media only interviews scientists that agree with them. In answer to the person that answered the question, the Republicans lost in 2006 because they drifted away from their own platform. In addition, Katrina was not the GOP's fault - look at the governor & mayor - no one has ever made them answer for all the mistakes that were made by them!! The Federal Govt. is not everybody's babysitter!
No Republicans are not smarter than scientists, but most scientists agree that humans have a very minimal effect on global warming. Oh and by the way why was Katrina such a big deal? It is because of everyone standing around waiting for handouts rather than doing anything to help themselves. It was not the Republicans fault that New Orleans is filled with uneducated lazy people.
Republicans are more "plugged" in to NASA data and space studies on the increasing temperatures measured on our nearby planet neighbors. It won't matter for this next election and possibly the one after that, but anyone who think anyone will consider "Global Warming" as a people oriented issue in 8-10 years needs to do their research. Hopefully before Democrats or New Republicans looking to distance themselves from President Bush spend the farm about a crackpot theory that concerns 1 or 3% climbing CO2, which actually helps dump heat, given our atmospheric make up...
Last time I checked "Republicans" are a Political Party. "Democrats" are a Political Party. Scientists have now become a Political Party thanks to the Global Warming hysteria. Smarter? Probably not, but then again the same applies to Democrats. Scientists don't know with any certainty what exactly is going on with our climate. They are not united (as the media would have you believe).

I think climate change is a natural process, but we do need to clean up our act and tell OPEC to kiss our BUTTS.

When the last Ice ended was that "Global Warming"? Did the Mammoth cause it by driving SUVs?
and Al Gore is a scientist? no.....

Perhaps its just that the Republicans actually listen to the scientist who know what they are talking about instead of some politician who is still sore over his loss in the 2000 election.after all, it took only 2 minutes 18 seconds for Gore to rant about 2000 in his movie "A Convenient Lie"...better known as "An Inconvenient Truth"!
No. They just think they are.
And which scientists are you talking about? The growing number who are coming out and saying that it is not caused by man?
Overall Government bureaucracy is to blame for the Katrina AFTERMATH(not Katrina itself).
They lost in 2006 because they weren't Republican enough. The Republican voting base held them accountable for overspending and too much government.
Nope... we just believe in making rational responses instead of "the sky is falling" emotional reactions to problems which is the modus operandi of the left...

There are enough qualified scientists that have departed from or question Al Gore's "science"... Here are 13 international scientists who were once "true believers" who have abandoned Al Gore:

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?f...

BTW, when did gathering information and making informed decisions become a bad thing?

The answers post by the user, for information only, FunQA.com does not guarantee the right.



More Questions and Answers:
  • What role do government subsidies play in the ethanol industry?
  • After you make your carbon footprint how do you get that messy stuff off of your shoes?
  • The four most common species of maple trees?
  • Does anyone know what illness is killing off the population of Tassie Devils in Tasmania, Australia?
  • Does anyone know if there is a freecycle group in Minneapolis Minnesota?
  • Is there anywhere in the uk i can recycle type 5 plastics?
  • Formaldehyde in OSB; I used it all over my house, should I be concerned? Health issues? Cancer?
  • Would Al Gore invest in global warming if it could be used as an alternative fuel source?
  • Global warming vs. evolution?
  • Who know about green house effect?