Who thinks "global warming" is the most important thing you should worry about?
phase 1. “The Awakening“~The terrorists will use attacks like 9/11 to provoke the U.S. into declaring war on the Islamic world, which will mobilize Islamic radicals, getting them to rally around Al-Qaeda. Al-Qaeda considers this phase completed.
phase 2. “Opening eyes“~During this period, which journalist Fouad Hussein said would last until the end of 2006, the terrorists continue to form their secret battalions and show Muslims how to wage war on the “infidels” and the “western conspiracy”.
phase 3. “Arising and standing up”~This phase, which would last until 2010, will bring increasingly frequent attacks against secular Turkey and archenemy Israel. The aroused Muslims will go to war against the infidels, and the devastation will face will force world leaders to negotiate with Al-Qaeda.
phase 4. “The downfall“~This period will last until 2013 and will see the fall of the hated Arab regimes, including Saudi Arabia and Jordan. Oi
Answer:
You pose an interesting question, but environmental fundamentalism is a more pressing concern than Islamic fundamentalism. They both have many well-funded adherents, but eco-fascism is becoming more pervasive... and more persuasive. In the name of saving the world (a world that consistently fails to end according to their Chicken Little panics), environmentalists need to control what we eat, what we wear, how we travel, where we live, etc, etc. Empowering and emboldening governments around the globe, they are going to rescue us from ourselves, each other and Evil Businessmen, but who will rescue us from the government?
Environmentalism flawlessly plays on the self-loathing we'd already picked up from older faiths and other neuroses. First you project your own low self-esteem onto all Homo sapiens, then discover that pseudoscience supports your beliefs and unites millions of other neurotics. Frankly, I advocate the psychological health that nothing guarantees-- but only atheism offers. I'd be the first to say that theocracy is a serious threat, but are nations all over the world enthusiastically passing Islamic laws? No, they are passing Environmentalist laws.
Probley more the truth than not. I know they are tying to end our way of life in the west and freedoms
I think the UN and with it George Soros, Maurice Strong, Jeffrey Sachs, and other liberal extremist are who we should really worry about. Don't get me wrong there are some republicans out there that trouble me too.
But the war on terror and global warming are also just as important but again extremist on both sides is what we really should worry about but especially liberal extremist.
no, neither global warming or al-qaeda's wold domination plans worry me. I'm actually more worried about being in a car wreak since global warming scientifically seems to be just a passing fad and crazy "psedo-religions" have been failing at taking over the world since the dawn of crazy psedo-religions.
phase-1, 9/11.
phase-2, have the US invade iraq.
phase-3, now begins the real plan, inspiring millions to join them, all around the world.
phase-4, we're screwed.
People should worry about where they will spend eternity rather than worry about global warming.
In A global nuclear war there are no winners
that is the biggest worry
please ask these people to wake up. let fight to save the earth rather than go to war.
Understanding that recently the Congress (more specifically, the Senate) voted to approve the $95 billion Iraq War Bill, I don't think it is time to think about global warming on a national level. Two major projects like the Iraq War and Global Warming just don't mix. For now, while the Iraq War continues to be the focus of U.S. budget, global warming should be an issue that each state should handle individual. Even though without congressional legislation, states could refuse to take no actions, in 2002, when congress voted to go into Iraq, they indirectly voted to put global warming in the back seat. Recently, when they passed the Iraq War Bill, even after a compromise, Senators once again put global warming in the back seat. Though its a shame that global warming will be rejected, as a nation already in heavy debt, we just can't afford a national program, unless we want a repeat of the 1930's.
a fantastic question! (I starred it for u)
i agree with u 100% in all of your information you have provided us. you are correct 100%, your phases have no false data according to my 'calculations'. and i love how you named all of the phases! they are all cool names!
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...
Did you know four out of ten republican presidential candidates don't believe in the idea of evolution.
That's scary man..
Republicans scare me!
Global warming is on the bottom of my list. To quote the National Academy of Sciences "The climates of the earth have always been changing, and they will doubtless continue to do so in the future. How large these future changes will be, and where and how rapidly they will occur, we do not know.
Since we've been attacked by terrorists before (but have yet to see the world spontaneously combust, or significant species of animals start dying off, oceans to dry up, etc.) I'm going to say we have much bigger fish to fry.
The answers post by the user, for information only, FunQA.com does not guarantee the right.
More Questions and Answers: