Why worry about Global Warming?
Answer:
Nuclear energy is actually a safe and viable source of energy. Nuclear waste can be contained and recycled. Where as CO2 and other gases are nearly impossible to contain. People fear nuclear energy but most times their fears are based on misinformation.
Nuclear energy is the best chance we have at making a significant reduction in green house gas emissions. Coal burning power plants are the most commonly used power plants in the US and they are far and away the biggest source of CO2 emissions.
Other alternatives like wind, solar, and water powered plants are very very expensive and very inefficient. It's not possible to rely on these sources as our main souce of energy.
Edit: Just so you know... reducing your own personal energy use does nothing except lower your bill. Energy companies always produce a surplus in order to prevent brown outs. This energy is not stored up if it isn't used.
I had a hard time accepting it when I found out but sadly one person really does not make a difference (at least in this case).
Don't worry about it. It is just cycles of the earth. It has happened before and it will happen again.
Then visit GREENPEACE.ORG
There you will know why we should worry about our planet.
Anyway, God created us stewards of His creation so it's basically our moral responsibility to do our duty because nature nurtures if we nurture nature.
You right and you're wrong. I don't believe in global warming. I can cherry pick evidence that proves global warming doesn't exist just like the believers cherry pick their evidence.
The ice will melt ,lakes , rivers will shrink, air pollution making it harder for us to breathe, animals will die, we may destroy our own planet.
Tips to avoid global warming
Change your light bulbs to fluorescent, Try to stop using hot water, raise your house temperature 3 degrees up in the summer & 3 degrees in the winter it will save money to your energy bill, recycle glass,paper,aluminum.
The problem is that the effects take so long from the time the cause starts. We may already have put enough CO2 in the atmosphere to flood all of Florida. The other problem is how do you measure the "average" temperature of the Earth and if you do how do you not know is a normal swing in climate. Remember we are only talking about 0.5 degrees F here. We may all need swimsuits soon.
Because it will cost us huge sums of money.
Moving people away from coasts, changing what farms grow and irrigation systems, replacing things lost to flooding. More here:
http://www.reuters.com/article/sciencene...
http://www.ipcc.ch/spm6avr07.pdf...
The resulting economic Depression will make the 1930s look like good times.
Nuclear power is far less risky. We know how to make safe power plants, we're good at that kind of engineering. We know how to bury the waste safely, it's just a political problem to pick a site.
Scientists have proven this is not a natural cycle.
"There's a better scientific consensus on this [climate change] than on any issue I know... Global warming is almost a no-brainer at this point. You really can't find intelligent, quantitative arguments to make it go away."
Dr. Jerry Mahlman, NOAA
Good websites for more info:
http://profend.com/global-warming/...
http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/sci...
http://www.realclimate.org
"climate science from climate scientists"
Because I don't want my Mom's house under ocean water!
Most nuclear power plants are absolutely safe. The whole reason Chernobyl happened was the fact they didn't follow the guidelines and many of them weren't trained professionals. Plus Chernobyl and Three Mile Island happened a while ago, technology has improved tremendously.
Global climate change is a serious problem. The last time our levels of CO2 were a fraction as high as they were now an Ice age occurred. CO2 levels have never been this high in all recorded/known data. So I think it's time to be a little more green.
"Nuclear and other waste are far more dangerous than Global Warming gases."
Incorrect. Nuclear waste can be dealt with by storing it in a secure isolated location. We could even put it back in the same location from which the uranium was mined in the first place.
You don't seem to be aware of the potential consequenes of global warming. The WHO estimates that 150,000 people are already dying worldwide annually as a consequence of global warming, and projects that this number will double by 2030. If the Greenland Ice Sheet melts, sea levels will rise 23 feet. We'll soon be seeing more droughts, heat waves, water shortages, food shortages, etc. If we don't act soon, global warming may increase beyond a point where we can get it under control.
The hazard from nuclear waste pales in comparison.
It's a good point that you make and I guess it comes down to one of balance.
If we look at the record of the nuclear industry it is by and large a good one. There have been disasters such as Chernobyl but thye consequences of this almost pale into insignificance when compared to the effects of climate change that have already been witnessed. The World Health Organisation for example has calculated that one person dies every three minutes because of the effects of global warming and one person becomes infected through diseases occasioned by global warming every three seconds.
Sticking with figures from the WHO, Chernobyl was and will be responsible for about 9,000 deaths. You'd need approx 20 Chernobyls a year to equal the number of deaths from global warming. Within 30 years you'd need a Chernobyl every week.
In the worst case scenario 2.5 billion people will need to be relocated due to global warming. That's about 7,500 times the highest estimate of the number that were relocated following Chernobyl.
The thing about global warming is that it affects everyone, about half the world's population won't be affected to any great extent but the other half will. Any nuclear disaster, short of an all out nuclear exchange, is only going to affect a comparatively small number of people.
The answers post by the user, for information only, FunQA.com does not guarantee the right.
More Questions and Answers: