How can you prove it doesnt exist?

How can you believe that global warming doesnt exist even though theres proof that it does and yet you're willing to believe that god truly exists. You dont even believe it, in your eyes you know he does. Some of us just settle for believing he might, you say it like its a fact when there is no way to prove it. But yet you have evidence that global warming exists and yet you dont wanna believe it. Id give you evidence but then youll just b!tc# that its too long as you probably will by the end of this paragraph.

Answer:
Very few people disput the fact that global warming exists. Some dispute the fact that humans are the primary contributor to the current global warming.

People believe in god because they're raised to believe it. If we taught kids better science, they'd believe the reality of global warming too.
How can you prove that humans cause global warming when it was warmer a thousand years ago than it is now? Several thousand years ago New York was buried under a mile of ice and yet it seems to have melted off without much help from humans. What makes you believe that the planet needs human help to have a warm spell when all the evidence is otherwise?
I don't need to prove God exists, neither does anyone else.

Why do you need to prove the existence of Global Warming?

No one has proven that man has caused global warming. You only believe it because you want to.
What proof do you have that it does exist. It's only a theory. In the 70s we were suppose to go into an ice age.
if someone doesn't believe in climate change from the burning of fossil fuels then tell them(someone like senator Inhofe) to run their car in the garage with the door closed for about 20 minutes to a hour and then i think they'll get the picture considering theres probably about 100 millions cars in the US alone
since everyone should know the ozone layer holds are atmosphere in so that gas can't escape.
Why are you comparing Religion and Science, they are too separate issues, and, in this case, have nothing to do with each other. Global warming, is still being debated as their hasn't been conclusive proof that it exists because of the natural cycles of the earth, or as a result of what humans are doing. I tend to think that even if it is a natural cycle, that we can reduce the damage that we are doing to the earth, if only so that we dont' poison ourselves. Religion is another topic.
Okay, sure, I like a challenge. So here goes:

The word religion means "to search for the source". The source of life: a purpose for existing. We anthropomorphize that idea and call it God. Whether or not you believe in religious texts, God = purpose and therefore the concept continues to exist in spite of organized religion, not because of it. People are leaving the church in record numbers, but they are still seeking God. They are still trying to find their individual purpose.

Global Warming is also an invented term. 30 years ago it was called the Greenhouse Effect, then Global Warming, then Climate Change, then Global Warming again. To avoid all the BS surrounding a name I call it "excess energy in the biosphere". So to me Global Warming is only two words that some people use to describe a concept and since those two words don't do a great job of it, I can choose to ignore the term, say it doesn't exist and call what is happening excess energy in the biosphere.

Ipso facto, God exists, Global Warming doesn't.
People can believe what ever they choose to. If you believe in one God or ten Gods, it doesn't effect me.

However, your belief in so-called "global warming" does effect me, as my tax dollars are spent to study it, and laws are passed to change the way I live.

If you want to believe in "global warming" and change the light bulbs in your home, cycle to work, compost and recycle, that's fine. When you force me to do the same, I want to see proof like predicting the climate 6 month from now, 1 year, 5 years, and 10 years out before I will believe anything you say.
Read "The Politically Correct Guide to Global Warming" by Christopher C. Horner. You will soon find out that this is just part of a bigger idea to redistribute the wealth and turn the country into a communist one. I hope you like breadlines!

The government tried this argument thirty years ago: it was called "Global cooling" back then. The book references the article in Newsweek that featured how we were going to freeze to death. Today, we're going to burn.
Prove that it is man-made and disprove God does not exist.
Free Tibet.
As residents of this 'borrowed' Planet, we can only correct the mistakes left by the previous generations who buried everything into the ground, [including the kitchen sink]. But as for saving the Planet, we're just dust specks on a big rock. In the end, the planet will correct itself,
as it has done for billions of years. Just ask a dinosaur. It's fundamental.
It is impossible to prove a negative.

The answers post by the user, for information only, FunQA.com does not guarantee the right.



More Questions and Answers:
  • Do you think there will be a year 3000?
  • Solar wind geo-thermal energys combined?
  • Is China the main country for animal cruelty activities?
  • I don't believe in global warming? will an inconvenient truth change my mind?
  • What place can I go too to turn in the paper that I recycoled??
  • Things to do at slumber partys?
  • Global warming. Please read my thoughts. Comment about it, thank you.?
  • Went swimming in the river Dee ( in scotland) today..?
  • Senator Imhofe loses to the Indians?