Global warming who doesn't agree that is real?
Answer:
If it's obvious where you live then it's not Global Warming. That simple.
From wiki:
Mass hysteria, also called collective hysteria or collective obsessional behavior, is the sociopsychological phenomenon of the manifestation of the same or similar hysterical symptoms by more than one person. It may begin when a group witnesses an individual becoming hysterical during a traumatic or extremely stressful event. A potential symptom is group nausea, in which a person becoming violently ill triggers a similar reaction in other group members.
Examples include certain cases of rioting and frenzy, and accidents in which people act "irrationally" (screaming, running in the wrong direction, attacking scapegoats, etc.).
What place would that be? Not arguing with you, just curious.
Personally, I believe that there is some truth in global warming, not only because there has been changes in our environment and the physical world in general, but also because global warming brings in the question of how excess growth can human consumption cannot only harm our planet, but ourselves as well. It is irresponsible to claim that we have no effect on our environment, and it's our duty to try and live repsonsively and respectively to the environment around us, even if we make small changes such as not littering, recyling more often, and planting more trees. Just because there haven't been tidal waves that have flooded every continent does not mean that we can live wanton lifestyles and not suffer the consequences.
Much of the global scientific community is now saying that this is really happening and they do present some pretty strong arguments. So I would have to agree with you.
In the past 10 years oil companies have spent over 16 billion dollars to publish confusing ads and information regarding global warming. They took the lead from tobacco companies. It's sickening what they're doing to the minds of people.
It's not solely global warming it's global climate change. I agree I don't know why people debunk this if it's one of the most accepted ideas in science. The causes of global climate change and the courses we as humans can take are debated, but there is no debate whether or not the Earth is in crisis.
The ice-core data is frequently cited as principal evidence to argue that CO2 is the earth’s main climate driver. Rises in the CO2 level "closely corellate" to rises in temperature. It is the jewel in the crown of the theory of man made global warming. But the ice-core data does not show that CO2 drives climate. It shows, very clearly, that the opposite is true!! Variations in temperature precede rises in atmospheric CO2 by several hundred years. It's true they correllate, but with an inverse relationship to that inferred by the Global Warming quacks.
Talk about an inconvenient truth.
-
I agree with you, global warming is real,,,,,,,,,
Global warming is real, and mostly caused by us.
It's pretty funny how skeptics keep bringing up the fact that historically CO2 lagged temperature, because it's one of the proofs that this warming is not natural.
CO2 can act in two ways (this is very basic science). It can cause warming through the greenhouse effect, and it is released by warming, since warm ocean waters can hold less CO2.
Historically, warming happened for other reasons, usually the Sun, and then CO2 rose hundreds of years later as the ocean warmed. This time CO2 is going up simultaneously with temperature, proving that this warming is caused by CO2 from burning fossil fuels.
More here:
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/arc...
Everyone knows it is real just some belive that it is a natural casue instead of man made.
I do not, in the area that this is an unnatural event going on. I do in that it appears it is about the right timing based on history and various cycles the Earth normally goes through for there to be a warming again. And CO2 levels should rise because of it.
And the evidence I see before the GW folks got hold of it showed much higher warming peaks in the past, even recent past. They have to erase these peaks and valleys to make their computer models come up with the widely varying predictions they are making!
And I notice too they NEVER seem to go back and compute from when the last deep ice age ended. They ignore the cotton and squash grown 10,000 years ago in the Andes in Peru!
I do not trust a computer program that has to ignore history and most of the inputs like sunspot cycles, Earth's axis motions, etc to predict we are about to have a catastrophe! And we must sacrifice in catastrophic proportions as the only way to exist.
Sacrifice to a political group that makes money and garners prestige and power by pushing this catastrophe they claim will happen "soon."
My car gets 30 mpg on gasoline, and will go over 300 miles before refilling, and cost me a very small amount to buy as a used car (recycling). I am supposed, in the climate's interest, to spend $25,000 to buy a new car that will only go 40 miles and then has to stop to recharge for 8 hours?
Sure would keep me from going to Washington to buttonhole my senator about anything! Or ever seeing Glacier National Park again, even if the glaciers are ordered back in by law!
And I do not see anything the GW folks say that will help me pay for all the new car, new home, new solar cells, new cow and hay for the winter (or are they abolishing winter here?).
Being on a fixed income from the government, who is going to pay my bills for all that is desired from me to "prevent global warming"??
I believe the earth is in the beginning of a warming cycle that will happen regardless, and that we need to be making preparations for the higher ocean levels, and changing our living locations, and finding out how to best grow crops on the new land that will be exposed.
And I do notice wide differences in how long it will take to be exposed from one doom-sayer to another.
Oh, and I do agree with one party who asked why we take corn away, since it is a foodstuff, to make ethanol. Out here, we suggest sugar beets...they are a crop that grows well here, makes loads of ethanol more easily, high yield, and does NOT take away from the world's food supply.
Not seen anybody tho even mention such adaption on here!!
Is that because the GW politicians wish to have a hand in the major food chain, to enforce their controls?
But aside from the bitter religiously-fervent political attacks on the "agnostics" and "unbelievers," do you really believe their brand new computer programs that have to be "adjusted" with data smoothing, data cherry-picking, and by eliminating past history, to make your future come out right by them?
This is not an attack on conservation, or recycling, as many make it out to be, it is an honest question as to why we should jump lockstep onto a political bandwagon that has such shaky axles that they have to furiously deny the wheels wobble.
And a consensus has been wrong before, for similar reasons...check history carefully! Dark Ages...the religio-politico-scientifical consensus was very naughty with anyone who doubted the sun went around the earth!! Remember?
Those who do not learn from History are condemned to repeat it!!
Global Warming and Climate Change is the biggest environmental threat humanity will face in the 21st century. Caused by an overabundance of the heat-trapping gas, carbon dioxide, in the earth's atmosphere, global warming has caused changes in climate worldwide as well as disruptions and dislocations in habitats and wildlife.
There is a lot we can do to combat climate change and global warming -- from moving to renewable energy to driving hybrid cars.
Check this website:
http://www.leonardodicaprio.org/whatsimp...
The answers post by the user, for information only, FunQA.com does not guarantee the right.
More Questions and Answers: