Do you agree with Erich Fromm's observation ? Karl Marx as a thinker of much greater scope than Freud?
Answer:
Marx made the simple mistake of championing mindless equality rather than equal opportunity.
And, history has proved that although his thoughts were provocative and worthy of study, they were not applicable at the societal level.
And, Freud made many mistakes also. But, he did enrich the fabric of science by his observations and his conclusions on the processes that determine mental functionality.
Both of these men were great thinkers for their time. And, they contributed to the scientific and cultural knowledge base. However, we, as thinkers and scientists, must choose to embrace and apply only some narrow aspects of their concepts rather than their overall philosophies.
Marx may have been a thinker but everything he thought of was a disaster in practice. Freud was neither here nor there but at least he is not responsible for the deaths of tens of millions of people who perished under Marxism. Marxism has been totally discredited in the laboratory of reality. The only place he is still honored is in the halls of higher learning where students are still being indoctrinated by their socialist Professors.
I am sure the professors are great thinkers, too. Probably never had a real job in their lives.
.
i dont agree with any of them. i agree with myself and a few others.
Sorry, but I have to say I don't think much of Fromm or Freud except as historic figures, and I don't believe that Marx's philosophies have held up as well as his contemporary, Friedrich Engels.
Engels and Marx both wrote about socialism, but Marx missed a lot of key points. Marx was rather naive and he believed that the most enlightened nations would be the ones to adopt communist practice as they had the most "intelligent" people. Okay, so he wasn't just naive, he was vain, too.
If Marx was to view which countries employ socialism today he would be shocked. He would never have envisioned people such as those of Vietnam and Korea taking advantage of his ideas. He actually believed that his ideas would take root particularly in Germany, England, and the United States.
However, Engels realized that communism was an ideal, and that as an ideal (and similarly to nationalism) it had certain inherent flaws. Engel's philosophy on the topic, as far as I am concerned, as much more in-depth.
It's important, however, to realize that although there was a sort of master-student mentality that was passed down the line, Marx, Freud, and Fromm all believed more-or-less in the same things, and those things were based on the teachings of one of the people they believed to be a great mind of their time, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.
Now, while even philosophers of today will say that Hegel's philosophy is somewhat "bulletproof" (it's very hard to find flaws with it) the trouble is that the philosophies he related are often inapplicable to real life.
So is it any wonder that people that were students of such inapplicable philosophies developed work themselves that when subjected to real life conditions would prove not to be robust?
The answers post by the user, for information only, FunQA.com does not guarantee the right.
More Questions and Answers: